We posted once on the ongoing wars across the planet, and pledged to continue it with all our goodwill. But due to the tight schedule of our Managing Director, and tighter schedule of your’s truly, it was a one timer.
Not any more. Here we dig it up from the premature grave, and present you a details of the war news across…umm…everywhere. Continue reading
Conservative leader Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, herself a Muslim, faced a threatening situation today, when she faced hardliner Islamists (who are apparently hateful towards their own religion, with their attack on Muslim political leaders), who at first abused and cursed her and then pelted her with eggs. (On second thought, they might not have been hateful of their own religion, since it was a woman they were attacking.)
They shouted at her, threatened her, and accused her of causing deaths to fellow Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq. (Yeah, because she must have suicide bombed a mosque in Afghanistan, or something.) They also abused her on her attire, and said that she was not dressed like a proper Muslim woman should…
Young and pretty Baroness Warsi, known as the most powerful Muslim woman politician in the U.K., was at first taken aback, as she was alone there to face it…but stood her ground firmly and rebuked the protesters and asked them to come in a debate table. (tsk tsk, Sayeeda baby, don’t you still know that these people don’t like democratic debates?) Continue reading
Hilarious! The New York Times is all in a frenzy today about the Swiss banning minarets, while they completely ignore terrorist threats.
First, the title of their editorial, A Vote for Intolerance, shows shocking intolerance towards the majority of women who supported the ban.
One might say that forcing marriages upon women, allowing marital rape, encouraging domestic abuse, and stoning women to death who are raped, are examples of intolerance. The New York Times thinks that direct democracy is an example of intolerance. (So do the Talibans…)
Now, let’s get to the crux of the Time’s hilariously inept argument: There is a rising tide spreading throughout Europe of extremism and intolerance… And this tide is democracy!
Let’s quote them:
Terrorist attacks by Islamic militants, notably 9/11 and the attacks on London, Madrid and Mumbai, have played a role in the perception of Muslims as a security threat. … there is no evidence of Islamic extremism.
Makes sense, doesn’t it?
Here’s a fill in the blank:
If left unchecked, ______ spreads fast.
“Terrorism”, you’re thinking? Nope, “xenophobia.”
But the vote also carries a strong and urgent message for all Europe…
And what message would that be?
Continue reading
Most of the serious students and followers of foreign relations have probably read about the Clash of Civilizations by Samuel P. Huntington. For the uninitiated, it is a upcoming clash between hardline Islamic and non-Islamic World that will define the future of the Planet.
It seemed true with Nicolas Sarkozy who called for a ban of Burqa in France, calling it to be a “medium of subversion” of eomen.
Now Europe is ablaze with a different problem. The Swiss government tried to prove itself highly democratic and called for a vote on the issue on banning of Minarets, which was, to the utter astonishment of them, supported by the Swiss people.
Europe has faced the onslaught of Islam since the Crusades. In recent days, the Fatwa on Salman Rushdie, or the uproar on the Danish cartoons of Prophet Mohammad, shook the sensible, non-religious, non-hardliner and free-spirited souls of the average Europeans, who were increasingly with the belief that these “immigrants” to their land can’t intermix with their culture.
In the UK, with Muslims constantly protesting British society, chanting that “Anglian soldiers go to hell”–(but surprisingly not protesting against terrorists who blow up mosques in Afghanistan)–the UK has even created Sharia Law courts for civil cases among Muslims, with the ability to support forced marriage and marital rape, for example.
Now we are seeing a great uproar from the sickening politically correct crowd, deploring the ban. (I am an India, a born Hindu, a practicing non-believer, and trust me I am disgusted with political correctness of the people of our country.)
Continue reading
The gunman who opened fire at Fort Hood, killing 12 and injuring 31, is just the latest example of Jihad in America that Americans are all too quick to ignore.
The gunman was Muslim, and he did shout “Allahu Akbar” before opening fire, but ABC correspondent Martha Raddatz just “wish[es] his name was Smith.”
But his name isn’t Smith, and that’s the problem. His name was Malik Nadal Hasan, and it’s not the first example of violence fueled by a certain religion. (Just read the Baghdad Daily for more examples.)
The fact is that radical Islamic terrorism is a big threat, and for the US to continue denying it, as if no violence has ever been carried out because of some interpretations of the Muslim religion, is a deadly problem.
Continue reading
